violated the California Environmental Quality Act.) Jones: that the City Council and city had violated the “due process” rights of the Hollywood community. The legal wrongdoing by City Hall resulted in an uncommon finding in July by Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Ann I. Later, the City Council rubber-stamped the committee’s approval without allowing public comment - ending a supposedly public process in which the public was prevented from considering and debating the key issues. “But no member of the public could see it - until it was posted the next day on the City Council website.” “We were asking city officials, ‘Where is the parking study that’s being voted on? Where is it?’ ” Wright says. The land-use committee, known as PLUM, approved the skyscraper, along with the developer’s request for reduced parking, in parking-challenged Hollywood. Later, emails showed that city planners likely never read the study: Just before the hearing, planner Jim Tokunaga couldn’t open the developer’s attachment. The Hirsch/Green Parking Study, it turned out, was merely an “exhibit” attached to a letter from the developer’s lobbying firm, in a pile of papers submitted at the hearing itself. Wright had minutes earlier warned the land-use committee that the key study repeatedly referred to in the “findings” - the parking study claiming that the development would need 30 percent less parking than the city generally requires - wasn’t even included in the 200,000 words and was never seen by the public. Then the committee quickly approved the Hollywood/Gower Project.Īn environmental attorney from the Silverstein Law Firm, Daniel Wright knew the Department of Planning hadn’t written the 231-page “supplemental findings.” Doug Haines, a representative of the firm’s client, the La Mirada Avenue Neighborhood Association of Hollywood, had discovered that the developer wrote the entire tome. Its chairman, City Councilman Ed Reyes, refused to let a member of the public rebut the developer, Hanover Company. City Council’s Planning and Land Use Management committee an added boldness. The 200,000-word, book-length document gave the L.A. In May 2011, at a final public hearing over whether to approve the tallest skyscraper in Hollywood history, the Department of Planning unveiled 231 pages of surprise “supplemental findings” backing the developer’s plan.
![savehollywood download savehollywood download](https://www.screensaversplanet.com/img/screenshots/screensavers/haring-clones-1.png)
How residents unearthed 200,000 words of phony findings City Hall used to illegally approve a skyscraper at Hollywood and Gower.
![savehollywood download savehollywood download](https://wiehandy.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/img_5cf32ffc58889.jpg)
Continue reading → Posted in Hollywood Development | Tagged census, City Council, deceitful practices, density, fiscal corruption, fraud, Garcetti, Hollywood Community Plan, Population, SCAG | 1 Reply L.A.
![savehollywood download savehollywood download](http://images.ifun.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/aerials.jpg)
Thus, it was a material fraud to tell the public that the baseline 2005 population was 224,426 ppl. There never was any official or public population data for the 2005 population of 224,426 ppl. In order to have the City Council approve the Garcetti Hollywood Community Plan on June 19, 2012, the HCP EIR deceitfully inflated Hollywood’s 2005 population by 23,880, claiming to have used SCAG Regional Transportation Plan numbers.Īfter the three lawsuits were filed and finding that the SCAG 2005 RTP had absolutely no data for Hollywood and finding no SCAG data on Hollywood’s population for any year including 2005 baseline or for the fictitious population of 244,602 ppl in 2030 anywhere in the 70,000 pages of administrative record, concerned citizens made a Government Code, § 6250 request for the SCAG population data on Hollywood.